PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCVX vs. LEXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCVX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 24.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FBCVX has underperformed LEXCX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while LEXCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


FBCVX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.94%
6M
16.61%
YTD
20.77%
1Y
32.50%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
9.68%

LEXCX

1D
0.48%
1M
2.63%
6M
22.16%
YTD
24.02%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
20.77%11.14%4.91%7.07%1.54%25.04%-4.72%21.71%-9.19%14.88%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
24.02%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCVX and LEXCX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between FBCVX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCVX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCVX
FBCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FBCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBCVXLEXCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

4.35

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

10.30

+4.01

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCVX and LEXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCVX drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than LEXCX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCVX and LEXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCVXLEXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.75%

-50.42%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-5.62%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-14.03%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.82%

-19.75%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.65%

-39.21%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-7.11%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.49%

-0.26%

Volatility

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) is 4.15%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FBCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCVXLEXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

4.50%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

10.87%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

14.08%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

16.47%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

18.97%

-1.99%

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCVX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCVX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

FBCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than LEXCX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
2.44%2.94%9.31%3.64%2.59%1.26%1.07%1.75%1.47%1.11%1.05%1.82%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.17%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCVX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FBCVX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCVX dropped -63.75% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.

FBCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCVX and LEXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer