PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBCVX vs. FMILX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBCVX and FMILX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FBCVX vs. FMILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.92%
6.35%
FBCVX
FMILX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FBCVX:

0.29

FMILX:

1.79

Sortino Ratio

FBCVX:

0.49

FMILX:

2.37

Omega Ratio

FBCVX:

1.06

FMILX:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

FBCVX:

0.27

FMILX:

2.62

Martin Ratio

FBCVX:

0.92

FMILX:

9.79

Ulcer Index

FBCVX:

3.63%

FMILX:

2.73%

Daily Std Dev

FBCVX:

11.34%

FMILX:

14.93%

Max Drawdown

FBCVX:

-63.06%

FMILX:

-56.03%

Current Drawdown

FBCVX:

-9.94%

FMILX:

-5.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCVX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than FMILX's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FBCVX has outperformed FMILX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while FMILX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return.


FBCVX

YTD

1.09%

1M

-3.47%

6M

-5.02%

1Y

4.71%

5Y*

5.98%

10Y*

6.62%

FMILX

YTD

2.07%

1M

-4.67%

6M

3.04%

1Y

27.25%

5Y*

10.75%

10Y*

5.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBCVX vs. FMILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCVX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FMILX's 0.59% expense ratio.


FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBCVX: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for FMILX: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBCVX vs. FMILX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBCVX is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBCVX is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBCVX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBCVX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBCVX is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBCVX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FMILX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMILX is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMILX is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMILX is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMILX is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMILX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMILX is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBCVX vs. FMILX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.291.79
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.000.492.37
The chart of Omega ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.061.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.272.62
The chart of Martin ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.929.79
FBCVX
FMILX

The current FBCVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCVX and FMILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.29
1.79
FBCVX
FMILX

Dividends

FBCVX vs. FMILX - Dividend Comparison

FBCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while FMILX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
0.90%0.91%1.53%1.07%1.26%1.07%1.48%1.62%1.09%1.05%1.77%1.39%
FMILX
Fidelity New Millennium Fund
0.00%0.00%0.30%1.63%2.04%1.59%0.97%1.25%0.90%1.18%1.03%9.39%

Drawdowns

FBCVX vs. FMILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCVX drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than FMILX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCVX and FMILX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.94%
-5.56%
FBCVX
FMILX

Volatility

FBCVX vs. FMILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) is 4.26%, while Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that FBCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.26%
6.11%
FBCVX
FMILX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab