FBCVX vs. FSDPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBCVX (Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund) and FSDPX (Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FBCVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSDPX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FBCVX returned 10.08%/yr vs 8.62%/yr for FSDPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBCVX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FSDPX.

Performance

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCVX achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly higher than FSDPX's 15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FBCVX has outperformed FSDPX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while FSDPX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.

FBCVX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: 18.91%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

FSDPX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 6M: 13.77%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: 9.34%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: 8.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBCVX Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund	18.91%	11.14%	4.91%	7.07%	1.54%	25.04%	-4.72%	21.71%	-9.19%	14.88%
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio	15.13%	11.32%	-2.95%	7.29%	-9.86%	31.66%	21.78%	12.40%	-23.74%	25.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCVX and FSDPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003	0.79

The correlation between FBCVX and FSDPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBCVX vs. FSDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCVX

FBCVX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FBCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FBCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FBCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FBCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FSDPX

FSDPX Risk / Return Rank: 25
FSDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FSDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FSDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FSDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FSDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCVX	FSDPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.28	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	1.81	+1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.22	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	1.92	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	5.96	+7.34

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the FSDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCVX and FSDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCVX drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FSDPX drawdown of -64.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCVX and FSDPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCVX	FSDPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.75%	-64.19%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-12.16%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.82%	-22.13%	+7.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.82%	-25.39%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.65%	-49.89%	+8.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.95%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-11.28%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	3.90%	-1.56%

Volatility

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) is 4.17%, while Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that FBCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCVX	FSDPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	6.72%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	14.81%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	18.25%	-5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.74%	20.40%	-6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.11%	21.77%	-4.66%

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCVX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FSDPX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCVX vs. FSDPX - Dividend Comparison

FBCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FSDPX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCVX Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund	2.48%	2.94%	9.31%	3.64%	2.59%	1.26%	1.07%	1.75%	1.47%	1.11%	1.05%	1.82%
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio	4.88%	1.94%	12.46%	5.46%	3.34%	0.71%	0.68%	1.22%	12.89%	5.08%	1.05%	2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCVX and FSDPX in my portfolio?

FBCVX and FSDPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBCVX or FSDPX?

FSDPX has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to FBCVX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCVX dropped -63.75% vs FSDPX's -64.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.