FBCV vs. VOOV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBCV (Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF) and VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FBCV is actively managed, while VOOV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCV returned 9.42%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for VOOV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBCV charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOV.

Performance

FBCV vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCV achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.53% return.

FBCV

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.01%
• 1Y: 24.31%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

VOOV

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: 20.11%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 12.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCV vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	10.38%	16.36%	10.26%	5.45%	-2.26%	26.18%	17.93%
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	7.53%	13.10%	12.21%	22.15%	-5.37%	24.87%	14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCV and VOOV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.92

The correlation between FBCV and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBCV vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBCV	VOOV
Financial Services	20.3%	15.0%
Healthcare	12.0%	11.6%
Industrials	11.9%	11.0%
Technology	11.8%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	11.1%
Communication Services	9.4%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.4%	9.5%
Energy	8.3%	7.6%
Basic Materials	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	4.6%
Real Estate	0.8%	3.4%

Return for Risk

FBCV vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCV

FBCV Risk / Return Rank: 77
FBCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FBCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FBCV Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FBCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FBCV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

VOOV

VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 65
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCV vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCV	VOOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.03	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	2.82	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	3.22	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.11	12.21	+1.90

FBCV vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCV and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCV vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCV drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum VOOV drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCV and VOOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCV	VOOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.55%	-37.31%	+21.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-6.27%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.32%	-17.55%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.55%	-18.10%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-1.25%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-3.83%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.65%	+0.08%

Volatility

FBCV vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is 2.77%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FBCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCV	VOOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	2.97%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	7.36%	+0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	9.97%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	14.44%	-0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.70%	16.92%	-2.22%

FBCV vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCV has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCV vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

FBCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VOOV's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	2.60%	2.95%	1.75%	1.68%	2.01%	3.13%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	1.67%	1.76%	2.10%	1.69%	2.19%	1.87%	2.45%	2.10%	2.65%	2.13%	2.24%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCV and VOOV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FBCV and VOOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBCV or VOOV?

VOOV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FBCV (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCV dropped -15.55% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

Which ETF is better, FBCV or VOOV?

On 5-year performance, VOOV leads with 11.18% vs 9.42% for FBCV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FBCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBCV or VOOV?

Over the 5-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBCV or VOOV?

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBCV or VOOV?

FBCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.67% for VOOV.

What is the main difference between FBCV and VOOV?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBCV and 0.07% for VOOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.