FBCGX vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both funds - FBCGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. FBCGX is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCGX returned 15.48%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for SCHD. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBCGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return.

FBCGX

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 37.63%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 15.48%
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 6M: 19.57%
• 1Y: 26.72%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 8.75%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	13.16%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	36.11%	-2.33%	14.15%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	20.66%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCGX and SCHD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between FBCGX and SCHD has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FBCGX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 87
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCGX	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.41	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.72	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	5.70	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.69	13.97	-2.27

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCGX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCGX	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.55%	-33.37%	-9.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-4.61%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-16.13%	-10.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.55%	-16.85%	-25.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.77%	-0.03%	-3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-3.31%	-5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	1.89%	+1.19%

Volatility

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that FBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCGX	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	3.05%	+4.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.37%	7.53%	+6.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.57%	10.93%	+7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	14.38%	+10.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.90%	16.72%	+8.18%

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCGX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	0.85%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.22%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCGX and SCHD in my portfolio?

FBCGX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBCGX or SCHD?

FBCGX has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCGX dropped -42.55% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.