FBCGX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).

FBCGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.

Performance

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	-6.85%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	36.11%	-2.33%	14.15%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	-2.49%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	16.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return.

FBCGX

• 1D: 4.62%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: -6.85%
• 6M: -4.17%
• 1Y: 28.16%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: —

FCGSX

• 1D: 4.44%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: -2.49%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 38.78%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 14.89%
• 10Y*: 21.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

FBCGX

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund

FCGSX

Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund

Return for Risk

FBCGX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBCGX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.66	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.34	-0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.98	-1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.40	13.43	-6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCGX and FCGSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBCGX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.66	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.63	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.88	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FBCGX and FCGSX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	1.04%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	10.74%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%

Drawdowns

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCGX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.55%	-38.77%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.28%	-13.10%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.55%	-38.77%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.61%	-6.44%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-7.05%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	2.91%	+0.56%

Volatility

FBCGX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) have volatilities of 7.92% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCGX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	8.15%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.30%	14.39%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.02%	24.14%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.03%	23.69%	+1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	23.19%	+1.81%