PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCGX vs. AQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund (AQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than AQEIX's 3.05% return.


FBCGX

1D
0.83%
1M
8.40%
YTD
17.59%
6M
18.73%
1Y
43.06%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*

AQEIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.61%
YTD
3.05%
6M
1.81%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
17.59%21.33%38.15%55.57%-37.84%23.00%62.92%36.11%-2.33%14.15%
AQEIX
LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund
3.05%6.72%13.29%14.08%-18.24%25.35%24.23%30.51%-8.03%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCGX and AQEIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.84

The correlation between FBCGX and AQEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCGX vs. AQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCGX
FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AQEIX
AQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund (AQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBCGXAQEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.16

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

1.47

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

5.32

+9.50

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the AQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCGX and AQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBCGXAQEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

0.93

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.33

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.40

+0.47

Drawdowns

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, smaller than the maximum AQEIX drawdown of -54.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and AQEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCGXAQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.55%

-54.20%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-7.02%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-19.25%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.55%

-24.51%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-8.70%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.94%

+1.07%

Volatility

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund (AQEIX) at 2.95%. This indicates that FBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCGXAQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

2.95%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

7.94%

+5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

11.08%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.97%

16.56%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

18.15%

+6.72%

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AQEIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCGX vs. AQEIX - Dividend Comparison

FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than AQEIX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQEIX
LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity Fund
5.80%5.98%7.90%2.63%6.05%12.61%6.73%10.98%23.36%8.24%7.92%7.69%
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
0.82%0.97%0.62%0.26%0.12%6.71%1.26%0.28%0.46%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCGX and AQEIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBCGX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to AQEIX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCGX dropped -42.55% vs AQEIX's -54.20%.

FBCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCGX and AQEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer