FBCG vs. SOUN
FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, FBCG returned 28.04%/yr vs 29.87%/yr for SOUN. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FBCG vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -30.79% return.
FBCG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 32.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SOUN
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -30.79%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBCG vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.31% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -18.62% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -30.79% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -79.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCG and SOUN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCG vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank
FBCG
SOUN
FBCG vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBCG | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.00 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | -0.38 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | -0.60 | +8.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBCG vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and SOUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCG | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -93.55% | +49.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -72.43% | +57.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.89% | -75.65% | +47.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -71.52% | +66.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -66.93% | +55.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 45.29% | -41.30% |
Volatility
FBCG vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is 7.21%, while SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that FBCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCG | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 17.69% | -10.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 52.15% | -37.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 80.70% | -61.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 136.27% | -110.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 136.27% | -110.50% |
Dividends
FBCG vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison
FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCG and SOUN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOUN has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to FBCG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCG dropped -43.56% vs SOUN's -93.55%.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCG and SOUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer