FBCG vs. AIRR
FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. FBCG is actively managed, while AIRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCG returned 14.46%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBCG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
FBCG vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return.
FBCG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 32.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
FBCG vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.31% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 41.44% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 38.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCG and AIRR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FBCG and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
FBCG vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBCG
AIRR
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Technology
FBCG
AIRR
Consumer Cyclical
FBCG
AIRR
-
Communication Services
FBCG
AIRR
-
Healthcare
FBCG
AIRR
-
Industrials
FBCG
AIRR
Financial Services
FBCG
AIRR
Consumer Defensive
FBCG
AIRR
-
Real Estate
FBCG
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
FBCG
AIRR
-
Utilities
FBCG
AIRR
-
Energy
FBCG
AIRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCG vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
FBCG
AIRR
FBCG vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBCG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 5.01 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 18.33 | -10.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBCG vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, roughly equal to the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -42.37% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -13.09% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.89% | -27.95% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | -27.95% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -1.89% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -7.48% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 3.57% | +0.42% |
Volatility
FBCG vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is 7.21%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that FBCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 9.32% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 20.81% | -5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 26.19% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 25.45% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 26.36% | -0.59% |
FBCG vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBCG vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCG and AIRR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to FBCG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCG dropped -43.56% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 14.46% for FBCG. On fees, FBCG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBCG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
FBCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FBCG and 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCG and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer