FBAPX vs. CRMVX
FBAPX (Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund) and CRMVX (Potomac Managed Volatility Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FBAPX returned 4.56%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for CRMVX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBAPX charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for CRMVX.
Performance
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAPX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than CRMVX's 1.81% return.
FBAPX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMVX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund | 0.75% | 7.77% | 1.57% | 6.73% | -9.94% |
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund | 1.81% | 4.91% | 1.22% | 0.25% | 9.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAPX and CRMVX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022 | 0.23 |
The correlation between FBAPX and CRMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAPX vs. CRMVX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAPX
CRMVX
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAPX | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 4.96 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 15.29 | -8.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAPX | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.98 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.00 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAPX drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum CRMVX drawdown of -97.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAPX and CRMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAPX | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -97.39% | +83.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -1.62% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.04% | -97.39% | +91.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -97.11% | +95.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -24.30% | +19.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.52% | +0.40% |
Volatility
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAPX | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 1.34% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 2.99% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 4.07% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 1,597.76% | -1,592.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 1,468.01% | -1,462.33% |
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than CRMVX's 1.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAPX vs. CRMVX - Dividend Comparison
FBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than CRMVX's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund | 5.65% | 5.75% | 3.75% | 2.74% | 0.57% | 2.59% | 0.95% |
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund | 4.72% | 4.61% | 4.81% | 4.08% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBAPX and CRMVX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBAPX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to CRMVX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAPX dropped -14.34% vs CRMVX's -97.39%.
CRMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAPX and CRMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer