PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBAOX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAOX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.37% return.


FBAOX

1D
0.20%
1M
4.01%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.35%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBAOX
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A
10.13%14.81%4.65%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FBAOX and FRGAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.95

The correlation between FBAOX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBAOX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAOX
FBAOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FBAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FBAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBAOXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.48

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.27

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.55

14.61

+3.94

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAOX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBAOXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.55

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

1.54

+0.07

Drawdowns

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBAOXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.61%

-11.77%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-7.03%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-1.58%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.57%

-0.22%

Volatility

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that FBAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBAOXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.75%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.80%

7.19%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.57%

9.03%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

10.31%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

10.31%

+1.20%

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FBAOX
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A
4.88%5.40%6.01%0.00%0.00%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FBAOX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FBAOX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAOX dropped -12.61% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FBAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBAOX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer