FBAOX vs. FRGAX
FBAOX (Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBAOX returned 24.56% vs 22.55% for FRGAX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBAOX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.
Performance
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAOX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.37% return.
FBAOX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRGAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 10.13% | 14.81% | 4.65% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 9.37% | 17.10% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAOX and FRGAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FBAOX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAOX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAOX
FRGAX
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAOX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.48 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 3.27 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.55 | 14.61 | +3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAOX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 2.55 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 1.54 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and FRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAOX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -11.77% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -7.03% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -1.58% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.57% | -0.22% |
Volatility
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that FBAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAOX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.75% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 7.19% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 9.03% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 10.31% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 10.31% | +1.20% |
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAOX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 4.88% | 5.40% | 6.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.83% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FBAOX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FBAOX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAOX dropped -12.61% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.
FBAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAOX and FRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer