FBALX vs. PRGSX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FBALX (Fidelity Balanced Fund) and PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FBALX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity, while PRGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, FBALX returned 11.70%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for PRGSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBALX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for PRGSX.

Performance

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBALX achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than PRGSX's 19.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FBALX has underperformed PRGSX with an annualized return of 11.70%, while PRGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.

FBALX

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

PRGSX

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 19.13%
• 6M: 20.89%
• 1Y: 36.75%
• 3Y*: 22.39%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 16.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBALX Fidelity Balanced Fund	8.71%	15.11%	16.09%	20.31%	-18.29%	18.27%	22.45%	24.40%	-3.98%	16.52%
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund	19.13%	21.42%	16.80%	25.70%	-28.01%	9.81%	52.29%	35.84%	-4.51%	32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FBALX and PRGSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996	0.88

The correlation between FBALX and PRGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBALX vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBALX

FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PRGSX

PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBALX	PRGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.93	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	2.53	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.35	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	2.91	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	11.56	+4.52

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the PRGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBALX and PRGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBALX drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBALX and PRGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBALX	PRGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.57%	-64.06%	+20.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-12.77%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-21.13%	+8.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.89%	-38.11%	+15.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.68%	-38.11%	+11.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-3.75%	+2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-13.47%	+9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	3.21%	-1.83%

Volatility

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) is 3.69%, while T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that FBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBALX	PRGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	8.81%	-5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.41%	16.52%	-9.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.06%	19.31%	-10.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.24%	19.91%	-7.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.81%	19.88%	-7.07%

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBALX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBALX vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison

FBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than PRGSX's 8.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBALX Fidelity Balanced Fund	5.22%	5.69%	5.67%	2.28%	8.06%	9.66%	5.90%	4.24%	10.99%	7.90%	3.07%	7.70%
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund	8.06%	9.60%	6.73%	0.27%	0.00%	13.67%	5.67%	2.21%	5.81%	0.03%	0.63%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBALX and PRGSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FBALX and PRGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBALX or PRGSX?

PRGSX has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to FBALX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBALX dropped -43.57% vs PRGSX's -64.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.