FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FBAL.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF) and FCIL.NEO (Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBAL.NEO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCIL.NEO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada International Low Volatility Index. FBAL.NEO is actively managed, while FCIL.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBAL.NEO returned 10.81%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for FCIL.NEO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBAL.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCIL.NEO.

Performance

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAL.NEO achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly higher than FCIL.NEO's 4.76% return.

FBAL.NEO

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 6.81%
• 1Y: 16.77%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 10.81%
• 10Y*: —

FCIL.NEO

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 4.76%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 10.07%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: 8.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FBAL.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF	7.17%	12.92%	19.42%	13.96%	-7.02%	11.50%
FCIL.NEO Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF	4.76%	19.10%	7.89%	11.49%	-6.83%	7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021	0.41

Over the past year, FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAL.NEO

FBAL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 67
FBAL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FBAL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FBAL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBAL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FBAL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FCIL.NEO

FCIL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 22
FCIL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FCIL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FCIL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCIL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FCIL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBAL.NEO	FCIL.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	0.70	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	1.06	+2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.15	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	1.10	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	2.70	+8.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAL.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the FCIL.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBAL.NEO	FCIL.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	0.70	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.27	0.65	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.53	+0.70

Drawdowns

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, smaller than the maximum FCIL.NEO drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBAL.NEO	FCIL.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.83%	-20.28%	+6.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.04%	-9.17%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.29%	-9.17%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.83%	-20.28%	+6.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-5.63%	+5.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-4.53%	+2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	3.74%	-2.30%

Volatility

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) is 2.78%, while Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FBAL.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBAL.NEO	FCIL.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	3.59%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.08%	9.73%	-3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.54%	14.46%	-6.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.58%	12.90%	-4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.57%	13.61%	-5.04%

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAL.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FCIL.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBAL.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FBAL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while FCIL.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FBAL.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF	1.50%	1.61%	1.42%	1.71%	4.48%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%
FCIL.NEO Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.94%	2.44%	2.53%	3.78%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO in my portfolio?

FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBAL.NEO or FCIL.NEO?

On fees, FBAL.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBAL.NEO or FCIL.NEO?

FBAL.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIL.NEO.

What is the main difference between FBAL.NEO and FCIL.NEO?

FBAL.NEO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while FCIL.NEO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBAL.NEO and 0.45% for FCIL.NEO.