PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO) and Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series (FCRI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIL.NEO achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than FCRI.TO's -0.75% return.


FCIL.NEO

1D
2.54%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
5.42%
6M
9.41%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*

FCRI.TO

1D
2.92%
1M
-7.09%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
7.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIL.NEO
FCIL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FCIL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FCRI.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO) and Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series (FCRI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCIL.NEOFCRI.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.57

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCIL.NEOFCRI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.55

-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between FCIL.NEO and FCRI.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIL.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCRI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCIL.NEO
Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.94%2.44%2.53%3.78%2.15%
FCRI.TO
Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series
2.83%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, which is greater than FCRI.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIL.NEO and FCRI.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCIL.NEOFCRI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.28%

-11.01%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.04%

-7.09%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-1.28%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

Volatility

FCIL.NEO vs. FCRI.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCIL.NEOFCRI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

13.39%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

13.39%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

13.39%

+0.26%