PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 17.21% return.


FB

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UPRO

1D
-4.27%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
17.21%
6M
13.86%
1Y
62.29%
3Y*
46.23%
5Y*
20.37%
10Y*
30.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FB vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FB and UPRO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FB vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

FB vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FB vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-76.82%

+75.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-10.27%

+9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-14.39%

+14.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

Volatility

FB vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02%

37.35%

-32.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

50.62%

-45.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

53.79%

-48.77%

FB vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FB vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than UPRO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FB
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
1.24%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.74%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FB and UPRO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.74% for UPRO.

FB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. Both ETFs track S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FB and 0.89% for UPRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer