PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FB having a 6.03% return and JANB slightly higher at 6.08%.


FB

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.90%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.08%
6M
7.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FB vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FB and JANB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FB vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBJANBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.04

1.97

+1.08

Drawdowns

FB vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.38%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-6.52%

+5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.22%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-1.14%

+0.84%

Volatility

FB vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBJANBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67%

7.41%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.67%

7.41%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

7.41%

-2.74%

FB vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FB vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FB and JANB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FB.

FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FB and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer