PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAZTX vs. MUJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund (FAZTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAZTX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than MUJ's 5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FAZTX has underperformed MUJ with an annualized return of 1.88%, while MUJ has yielded a comparatively higher 2.59% annualized return.


FAZTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.86%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
1.88%

MUJ

1D
0.74%
1M
1.35%
YTD
5.41%
6M
4.83%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
8.66%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAZTX
Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund
1.65%3.09%2.00%5.93%-10.29%1.87%5.17%7.33%0.69%5.46%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.41%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FAZTX and MUJ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1998

0.27

The correlation between FAZTX and MUJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAZTX vs. MUJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAZTX
FAZTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAZTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAZTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAZTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FAZTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAZTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund (FAZTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAZTXMUJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.44

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.07

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

8.38

+0.75

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAZTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the MUJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAZTX and MUJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAZTXMUJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.21

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.01

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.23

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.35

+0.72

Drawdowns

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAZTX drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum MUJ drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAZTX and MUJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAZTXMUJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-41.72%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-9.41%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.39%

-12.17%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.24%

-32.71%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.24%

-32.71%

+17.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-2.74%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-9.04%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

2.32%

-1.51%

Volatility

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund (FAZTX) is 1.01%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that FAZTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAZTXMUJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

2.87%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

6.90%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58%

8.84%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.96%

10.35%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

11.20%

-7.19%

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAZTX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than MUJ's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAZTX vs. MUJ - Dividend Comparison

FAZTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than MUJ's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAZTX
Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund
2.87%3.09%3.07%2.70%2.56%2.02%2.58%2.89%2.81%2.58%2.82%3.39%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.28%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAZTX and MUJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to FAZTX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAZTX dropped -19.00% vs MUJ's -41.72%.

FAZTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAZTX and MUJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer