FAZ vs. LINT
FAZ (Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. FAZ is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. FAZ charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
FAZ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAZ achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.
FAZ
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -12.03%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- -17.74%
- 3Y*
- -40.57%
- 5Y*
- -30.61%
- 10Y*
- -44.72%
LINT
- 1D
- -12.86%
- 1M
- 11.99%
- YTD
- 744.89%
- 6M
- 773.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAZ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | 1.40% | -17.61% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 744.89% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAZ and LINT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAZ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
FAZ
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAZ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAZ | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAZ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAZ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAZ and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAZ | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -49.54% | -50.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -12.86% | -87.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.12% | -20.48% | -78.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.64% | — | — |
Volatility
FAZ vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAZ | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.64% | 168.83% | -125.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.67% | 168.83% | -113.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 168.83% | -106.90% |
FAZ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAZ has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAZ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
FAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | 3.35% | 5.07% | 7.34% | 4.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.63% | 0.56% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.10% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAZ and LINT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FAZ.
FAZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FAZ and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for FAZ and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer