PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAYZX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAYZX having a 8.43% return and FSIRX slightly higher at 8.74%. Over the past 10 years, FAYZX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


FAYZX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.04%
YTD
8.43%
6M
7.67%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
9.07%

FSIRX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.74%
6M
8.99%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAYZX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I
8.43%14.13%9.59%11.73%-13.69%17.17%16.39%23.15%-3.01%6.21%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.74%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FAYZX and FSIRX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between FAYZX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAYZX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAYZX
FAYZX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FAYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FAYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAYZXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.70

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

8.10

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

31.92

-20.28

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAYZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAYZX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAYZXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

3.51

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.92

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.86

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.61

+0.35

Drawdowns

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAYZX drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAYZX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAYZXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-33.39%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-2.05%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-5.81%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-12.82%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.64%

-19.98%

-1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.73%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-4.17%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

0.52%

+1.35%

Volatility

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.32%. This indicates that FAYZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAYZXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

1.32%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

3.77%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

4.75%

+5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

6.92%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.84%

6.74%

+3.10%

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAYZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAYZX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

FAYZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than FSIRX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAYZX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I
3.43%3.77%3.51%4.21%3.73%2.79%3.27%2.82%2.96%3.34%8.29%0.00%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.18%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAYZX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAYZX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to FSIRX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAYZX dropped -21.64% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAYZX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer