PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAYZX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAYZX achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 7.61% return.


FAYZX

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.43%
6M
0.65%
YTD
4.06%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
8.74%

FRGAX

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.67%
6M
5.42%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FAYZX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I
4.06%14.13%9.59%11.73%-0.28%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
7.61%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FAYZX and FRGAX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.86

The correlation between FAYZX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAYZX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAYZX
FAYZX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FAYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FAYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAYZXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.21

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

9.26

-4.93

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAYZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAYZX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAYZX drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAYZX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAYZXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-11.77%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-7.03%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-11.77%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-1.61%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-1.57%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.67%

+0.71%

Volatility

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 2.74%. This indicates that FAYZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAYZXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.74%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

8.17%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

9.88%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.02%

10.38%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.93%

10.38%

-0.45%

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAYZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAYZX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

FAYZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than FRGAX's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAYZX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I
3.47%3.77%3.51%4.21%3.73%2.79%3.27%2.82%2.96%3.34%8.29%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.86%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAYZX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAYZX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FRGAX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAYZX dropped -21.64% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAYZX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer