FAYZX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FAYZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 2015. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I | 0.32% | 14.13% | 9.59% | 11.73% | -13.69% | 17.17% | 16.39% | 23.15% | -3.01% | 6.21% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAYZX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FAYZX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 8.62%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
FAYZX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAYZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAYZX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FAYZX
FCNTX
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAYZX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 0.83 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.30 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.17 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.74 | 4.57 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAYZX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.83 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.67 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.80 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.76 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAYZX and FCNTX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FAYZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I | 3.49% | 3.77% | 3.51% | 4.21% | 3.73% | 2.79% | 3.27% | 2.82% | 2.96% | 3.34% | 8.29% | 0.00% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAYZX drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAYZX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAYZX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -49.19% | +27.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -11.30% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -32.59% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.64% | -32.59% | +10.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -11.30% | +4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -8.18% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.90% | -0.80% |
Volatility
FAYZX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) is 3.97%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that FAYZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAYZX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 5.19% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.99% | 10.56% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 19.69% | -7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.77% | 19.13% | -9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.76% | 19.61% | -9.85% |