PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATHX vs. LTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A (FATHX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATHX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FATHX has outperformed LTTIX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while LTTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.


FATHX

1D
1.13%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.79%
6M
9.88%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
10.34%

LTTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.74%
6M
2.70%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FATHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A
9.79%18.40%10.45%16.36%-17.73%13.68%16.19%25.46%-8.02%20.08%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FATHX and LTTIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.93

The correlation between FATHX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATHX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATHX
FATHX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FATHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FATHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTIX
LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A (FATHX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FATHXLTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.47

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

10.68

+1.37

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATHX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATHX drawdown since its inception was -54.71%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATHX and LTTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATHXLTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.71%

-19.33%

-35.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-3.64%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.44%

-5.77%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.13%

-16.92%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.22%

-19.33%

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-2.68%

-4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.84%

+0.95%

Volatility

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A (FATHX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that FATHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATHXLTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

1.34%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.84%

3.32%

+5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

4.18%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

6.37%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.69%

7.24%

+6.45%

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATHX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FATHX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

FATHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A
7.23%7.30%3.19%1.48%9.82%9.38%6.04%7.14%11.79%4.12%4.69%5.12%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FATHX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FATHX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATHX dropped -54.71% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

LTTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATHX and LTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer