FAST vs. TXRH
FAST (Fastenal Company) and TXRH (Texas Roadhouse, Inc.) are both stocks. FAST operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while TXRH operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FAST returned 18.35%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for TXRH. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAST vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than TXRH's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 18.35%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively lower 15.87% annualized return.
FAST
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
TXRH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
FAST vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 16.13% | 13.98% | 13.53% | 41.31% | -24.34% | 34.06% | 36.60% | 45.08% | -1.61% | 19.66% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 1.81% | -6.57% | 49.78% | 37.15% | 4.16% | 15.71% | 39.83% | -3.62% | 15.11% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAST and TXRH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAST and TXRH has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FAST:
$53.06B
TXRH:
$11.08B
FAST:
$1.13
TXRH:
$6.26
FAST:
40.81
TXRH:
26.77
FAST:
4.79
TXRH:
1.67
FAST:
6.28
TXRH:
1.83
FAST:
$8.44B
TXRH:
$6.06B
FAST:
$3.79B
TXRH:
$1.14B
FAST:
$1.80B
TXRH:
$701.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAST vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank
FAST
TXRH
FAST vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAST | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | -0.34 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | -0.58 | +1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAST vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and TXRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAST | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -76.59% | +13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -19.61% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -24.82% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | -30.45% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.71% | -58.04% | +27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | -16.13% | +9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -16.15% | +3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 11.36% | -0.40% |
Volatility
FAST vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fastenal Company (FAST) is 6.33%, while Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that FAST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAST | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 9.69% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.21% | 22.58% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.91% | 29.24% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 30.58% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 35.63% | -8.85% |
Dividends
FAST vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison
FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than TXRH's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 2.00% | 2.18% | 2.17% | 2.75% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 2.87% | 2.35% | 2.95% | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.74% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 1.71% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 2.02% | 1.34% | 0.46% | 2.13% | 1.68% | 1.59% | 1.58% | 1.90% |
Financials
FAST vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAST vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison
FAST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 982.90M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.
TXRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 499.53M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
FAST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 447.60M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
TXRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.34M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
FAST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 339.80M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
TXRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 123.43M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAST and TXRH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TXRH has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to FAST (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAST dropped -63.43% vs TXRH's -76.59%.
FAST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAST and TXRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer