FAST vs. JNJ
FAST (Fastenal Company) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. FAST operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FAST returned 18.29%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAST vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 15.88% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 18.29%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.
FAST
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 11.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 18.29%
JNJ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 16.43%
- 1Y
- 53.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
FAST vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 15.88% | 13.98% | 13.53% | 41.31% | -24.34% | 34.06% | 36.60% | 45.08% | -1.61% | 19.66% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 13.43% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAST and JNJ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.26 |
The correlation between FAST and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FAST:
$52.94B
JNJ:
$567.68B
FAST:
$1.13
JNJ:
$8.65
FAST:
40.72
JNJ:
26.85
FAST:
4.78
JNJ:
0.89
FAST:
6.27
JNJ:
5.86
FAST:
13.27
JNJ:
6.99
FAST:
$8.44B
JNJ:
$96.36B
FAST:
$3.79B
JNJ:
$66.60B
FAST:
$1.80B
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAST vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
FAST
JNJ
FAST vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAST | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.57 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 4.91 | -4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 14.52 | -13.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAST | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 3.19 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.55 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.54 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FAST vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAST | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -50.67% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -10.96% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -15.95% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | -18.41% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.71% | -27.37% | -3.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -6.06% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -11.88% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | 3.70% | +7.24% |
Volatility
FAST vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Fastenal Company (FAST) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.80%. This indicates that FAST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAST | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 5.80% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.37% | 12.41% | +6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 16.87% | +8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 16.87% | +7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 18.47% | +8.31% |
Dividends
FAST vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than JNJ's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 2.00% | 2.18% | 2.17% | 2.75% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 2.87% | 2.35% | 2.95% | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.74% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.26% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
FAST vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAST vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
FAST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 982.90M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
FAST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 447.60M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
FAST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 339.80M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAST and JNJ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAST has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to JNJ (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAST dropped -63.43% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAST and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer