FASPX vs. FSLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FASPX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M) and FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FASPX returned 10.60%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for FSLSX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FASPX charges 1.37%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FSLSX.

Performance

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FASPX having a 20.76% return and FSLSX slightly higher at 21.04%. Over the past 10 years, FASPX has underperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.

FASPX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 20.76%
• 6M: 22.32%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	20.76%	7.76%	-2.60%	19.93%	-7.82%	32.65%	7.70%	33.85%	-17.27%	17.34%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	21.04%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FASPX and FSLSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1984	0.97

The correlation between FASPX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FASPX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASPX

FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FASPX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.73	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.30	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	3.32	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.87	10.82	+5.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASPX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FASPX	FSLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	1.73	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.45	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.52	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.54	-0.12

Drawdowns

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASPX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASPX and FSLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASPX	FSLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.11%	-69.87%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.84%	-9.79%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.53%	-26.81%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.53%	-26.81%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.02%	-47.98%	-0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.83%	-8.28%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.99%	-0.33%

Volatility

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASPX	FSLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	4.27%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	14.50%	-2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	18.78%	-1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	20.50%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.01%	21.92%	+0.09%

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASPX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASPX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

FASPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	7.72%	9.32%	0.00%	2.40%	1.93%	7.80%	0.55%	4.98%	15.67%	7.26%	21.61%	0.80%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASPX and FSLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FASPX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FASPX or FSLSX?

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FASPX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASPX dropped -70.11% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.