FASMX vs. AAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).
FASMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 28, 1988. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.
Performance
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | -2.02% | 14.94% | 8.46% | 13.09% | -14.93% | 9.86% | 14.72% | 18.25% | -5.51% | 11.73% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 8.59% | 12.82% | 5.24% | 2.30% | -9.91% | 23.45% | 3.71% | 21.42% | -5.36% | 14.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASMX achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FASMX has underperformed AAAAX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while AAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.28% annualized return.
FASMX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
AAAAX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASMX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
FASMX
AAAAX
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASMX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 2.00 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.80 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 9.69 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASMX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.38 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASMX and AAAAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
FASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than AAAAX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | 7.74% | 7.58% | 3.88% | 2.18% | 6.78% | 2.91% | 2.40% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 2.24% | 1.69% | 5.77% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.26% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, smaller than the maximum AAAAX drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASMX and AAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASMX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -40.47% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -9.55% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -22.62% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.27% | -29.41% | +8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -4.57% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -6.89% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.77% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FASMX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that FASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASMX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 3.03% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 7.22% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.51% | 11.60% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.21% | 12.18% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 12.66% | -3.42% |