PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASEX vs. FGATX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASEX vs. FGATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (FGATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASEX achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than FGATX's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FASEX has outperformed FGATX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while FGATX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.


FASEX

1D
1.68%
1M
3.56%
YTD
17.58%
6M
17.64%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
10.97%

FGATX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.77%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASEX vs. FGATX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
17.58%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%
FGATX
Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
1.39%2.82%1.44%6.08%-12.04%1.47%4.52%7.92%0.23%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FASEX and FGATX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1987

-0.02

The correlation between FASEX and FGATX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASEX vs. FGATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FGATX
FGATX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FGATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGATX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FGATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGATX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASEX vs. FGATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (FGATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASEXFGATXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.58

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

2.34

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.87

7.36

+8.51

FASEX vs. FGATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FGATX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASEX and FGATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASEXFGATXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.36

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

-0.04

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.31

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.92

-0.40

Drawdowns

FASEX vs. FGATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASEX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, which is greater than FGATX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASEX and FGATX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASEXFGATXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.57%

-19.12%

-36.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-2.85%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.26%

-6.08%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

-16.91%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.56%

-16.91%

-27.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.77%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-2.67%

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.90%

+1.11%

Volatility

FASEX vs. FGATX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (FGATX) at 1.22%. This indicates that FASEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASEXFGATXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

1.22%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

2.16%

+8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

2.84%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

4.19%

+13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

4.29%

+15.92%

FASEX vs. FGATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FGATX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASEX vs. FGATX - Dividend Comparison

FASEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than FGATX's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.48%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
FGATX
Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
2.92%3.15%2.97%2.74%2.49%2.00%2.31%2.64%2.87%3.22%3.51%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASEX and FGATX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FGATX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASEX dropped -55.57% vs FGATX's -19.12%.

FGATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASEX and FGATX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer