FASDX vs. FSRRX
FASDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FASDX returned 9.53%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for FSRRX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FASDX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.
Performance
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASDX achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than FSRRX's 6.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FASDX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.
FASDX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
FSRRX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- 12.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A | 12.67% | 12.72% | 11.19% | 9.15% | -10.11% | 18.65% | 11.00% | 22.17% | -4.70% | 11.05% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 6.54% | 10.45% | 5.84% | 4.59% | -3.34% | 15.84% | 3.74% | 10.48% | -3.99% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FASDX and FSRRX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005 | 0.63 |
The correlation between FASDX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FASDX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank
FASDX
FSRRX
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FASDX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.49 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 4.65 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 19.13 | -2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASDX drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than FSRRX's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASDX and FSRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASDX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.09% | -33.42% | -25.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -2.69% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.62% | -5.80% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -12.78% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.01% | -19.93% | -10.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -2.69% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -4.21% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 0.65% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.35%. This indicates that FASDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FASDX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 1.35% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.54% | 3.81% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.44% | 4.87% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.98% | 6.88% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 6.73% | +5.70% |
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FASDX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison
FASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than FSRRX's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A | 6.91% | 7.75% | 5.04% | 5.48% | 3.98% | 8.22% | 5.45% | 6.46% | 7.92% | 6.39% | 4.68% | 6.13% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 4.21% | 4.68% | 4.82% | 5.29% | 7.31% | 5.35% | 2.25% | 3.05% | 9.39% | 1.57% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FASDX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FASDX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to FSRRX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASDX dropped -59.09% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.
FASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FASDX and FSRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer