FASDX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FASDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FASDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FASDX returned 8.09%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FASDX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASDX achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 7.15% return.

FASDX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 23.04%
• 3Y*: 14.66%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A	12.33%	12.72%	11.19%	9.15%	-10.11%	18.65%	11.00%	22.17%	-4.70%	10.45%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	7.15%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FASDX and FSPGX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FASDX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FASDX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASDX

FASDX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FASDX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.67	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	2.29	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.29	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	1.60	+2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.68	5.36	+11.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASDX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FASDX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	1.67	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.72	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.89	-0.35

Drawdowns

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASDX drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASDX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASDX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.09%	-32.66%	-26.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-16.17%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.62%	-23.32%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.27%	-32.66%	+15.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.70%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.51%	-6.37%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	4.81%	-3.43%

Volatility

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) is 2.35%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that FASDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASDX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	3.68%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.32%	11.65%	-5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.28%	15.45%	-7.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.96%	21.50%	-10.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	21.55%	-9.14%

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASDX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A	6.93%	7.75%	5.04%	5.48%	3.98%	8.22%	5.45%	6.46%	7.92%	6.39%	4.68%	6.13%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASDX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FASDX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FASDX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to FASDX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASDX dropped -59.09% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.