FAS vs. USD
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 21.20%/yr vs 60.21%/yr for USD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USD.
Performance
FAS vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 86.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed USD with an annualized return of 21.20%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.21% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 12.77%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- 1Y
- 1.34%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
USD
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 86.87%
- 6M
- 97.77%
- 1Y
- 207.86%
- 3Y*
- 111.11%
- 5Y*
- 65.02%
- 10Y*
- 60.21%
FAS vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -13.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 86.87% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and USD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and USD has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FAS vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
USD
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FAS
USD
Technology
FAS
USD
Industrials
FAS
USD
-
Basic Materials
FAS
-
USD
-
Communication Services
FAS
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
USD
-
Energy
FAS
-
USD
Healthcare
FAS
-
USD
-
Real Estate
FAS
-
USD
-
Utilities
FAS
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
USD
FAS vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 6.58 | -6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 18.43 | -18.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, roughly equal to the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -88.63% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -31.80% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -64.46% | +21.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -77.85% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -77.85% | -8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -13.67% | -6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -32.32% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.97% | 11.34% | +6.63% |
Volatility
FAS vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.45%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 29.56%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.45% | 29.56% | -17.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 52.44% | -18.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 65.34% | -21.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 77.19% | -21.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.33% | 69.61% | -8.28% |
FAS vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than USD's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.64% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and USD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (29.56%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 60.21% vs 21.20% for FAS. On fees, USD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 60.21% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.25% for USD.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.95% for USD.
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer