FAS vs. UPRO
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while UPRO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 21.20%/yr vs 29.76%/yr for UPRO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
FAS vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 20.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 21.20%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.76% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 12.77%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- 1Y
- 1.34%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
UPRO
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 20.70%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 64.83%
- 3Y*
- 46.83%
- 5Y*
- 21.40%
- 10Y*
- 29.76%
FAS vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -13.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 20.70% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 68.53% | -56.84% | 98.64% | 10.09% | 102.30% | -25.11% | 71.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and UPRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and UPRO has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FAS vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
UPRO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FAS
UPRO
Technology
FAS
UPRO
Industrials
FAS
UPRO
Basic Materials
FAS
-
UPRO
Communication Services
FAS
-
UPRO
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
UPRO
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
UPRO
Energy
FAS
-
UPRO
Healthcare
FAS
-
UPRO
Real Estate
FAS
-
UPRO
Utilities
FAS
-
UPRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
UPRO
FAS vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.30 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.43 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 10.01 | -9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -76.82% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -26.78% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -48.87% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -63.94% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -76.82% | -9.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -7.60% | -13.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -14.40% | -16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.97% | 6.50% | +11.47% |
Volatility
FAS vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.45%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.45% | 13.22% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 28.74% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 36.77% | +6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 50.52% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.33% | 53.83% | +7.50% |
FAS vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than UPRO's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.64% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.72% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and UPRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPRO has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 29.76% vs 21.20% for FAS. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 29.76% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.72% for UPRO.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer