PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 20.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 21.20%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.76% annualized return.


FAS

1D
4.15%
1M
12.77%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-13.89%
1Y
1.34%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
21.20%

UPRO

1D
1.54%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
20.70%
6M
21.09%
1Y
64.83%
3Y*
46.83%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
29.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-13.50%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
20.70%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and UPRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and UPRO has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FAS vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAS
UPRO

Financial Services

98.0%
28.8%

Technology

1.7%
17.8%

Industrials

0.2%
3.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.8%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

FAS
98.0%
UPRO
28.8%

Technology

FAS
1.7%
UPRO
17.8%

Industrials

FAS
0.2%
UPRO
3.4%

Basic Materials

FAS

-

UPRO
0.8%

Communication Services

FAS

-

UPRO
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FAS

-

UPRO
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

FAS

-

UPRO
2.0%

Energy

FAS

-

UPRO
1.4%

Healthcare

FAS

-

UPRO
3.8%

Real Estate

FAS

-

UPRO
0.8%

Utilities

FAS

-

UPRO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.30

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

2.43

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

10.01

-9.94

FAS vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAS vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-76.82%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-26.78%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

-48.87%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-63.94%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

-76.82%

-9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-7.60%

-13.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.12%

-14.40%

-16.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.97%

6.50%

+11.47%

Volatility

FAS vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.45%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.45%

13.22%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

28.74%

+4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

36.77%

+6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.59%

50.52%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.33%

53.83%

+7.50%

FAS vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than UPRO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
9.64%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.72%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and UPRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPRO has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 29.76% vs 21.20% for FAS. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 29.76% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.72% for UPRO.

FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer