PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. TPOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. TPOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -17.44% return, which is significantly lower than TPOR's 38.87% return.


FAS

1D
2.86%
1M
6.03%
YTD
-17.44%
6M
-9.85%
1Y
-3.37%
3Y*
36.76%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*
19.91%

TPOR

1D
3.74%
1M
18.57%
YTD
38.87%
6M
35.57%
1Y
74.65%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. TPOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-17.44%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%53.01%
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
38.87%3.26%-9.12%54.60%-58.70%105.18%-7.30%47.92%-44.95%51.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and TPOR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FAS and TPOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAS vs. TPOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAS
TPOR

Financial Services

98.0%

-

Technology

1.7%
16.7%

Industrials

0.2%
83.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FAS
98.0%
TPOR

-

Technology

FAS
1.7%
TPOR
16.7%

Industrials

FAS
0.2%
TPOR
83.3%

Basic Materials

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Communication Services

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Consumer Defensive

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Energy

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Healthcare

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Real Estate

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Utilities

FAS

-

TPOR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. TPOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TPOR
TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. TPOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASTPORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

2.21

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.19

6.25

-6.44

FAS vs. TPOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the TPOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and TPOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASTPORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

1.27

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.00

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.11

+0.06

Drawdowns

FAS vs. TPOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, roughly equal to the maximum TPOR drawdown of -87.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and TPOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASTPORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-87.59%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-34.00%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

-64.11%

+21.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-74.08%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.24%

-25.98%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.12%

-38.67%

+7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.79%

11.98%

+5.81%

Volatility

FAS vs. TPOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.33%, while Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASTPORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.33%

13.78%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.34%

44.39%

-11.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.37%

59.23%

-15.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.59%

67.76%

-12.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.35%

70.88%

-9.53%

FAS vs. TPOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TPOR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. TPOR - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than TPOR's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
10.10%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
0.66%0.91%1.43%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.96%1.22%8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and TPOR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPOR has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to FAS (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs TPOR's -87.59%.

On 5-year performance, FAS leads with 6.62% vs -0.13% for TPOR. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FAS has performed better with a 6.62% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TPOR.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 0.66% for TPOR.

FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while TPOR tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 1.01% for TPOR.

TPOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and TPOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer