FAS vs. MSTU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FAS is passively managed, while MSTU is actively managed. Over the past year, FAS returned 9.95% vs -98.18% for MSTU. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.

Performance

FAS vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -78.58% return.

FAS

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 15.69%
• 6M: -2.21%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 1Y: 9.95%
• 3Y*: 41.27%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: 21.81%

MSTU

• 1D: -5.07%
• 1M: -49.43%
• 6M: -80.82%
• YTD: -78.58%
• 1Y: -98.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	0.08%	21.48%	16.99%
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-78.58%	-89.07%	205.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and MSTU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.27

FAS vs. MSTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAS	MSTU
Financial Services	98.0%	-
Technology	1.8%	100.0%
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FAS vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 13
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 12

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAS	MSTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	-0.67	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	-2.72	+3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.72	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	-1.00	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.54	-1.20	+1.74

FAS vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and MSTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAS vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and MSTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAS	MSTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.61%	-99.43%	+7.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.88%	-98.62%	+57.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.18%	-99.31%	+91.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-73.33%	+42.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.43%	81.41%	-62.98%

Volatility

FAS vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) is 12.80%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 53.18%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAS	MSTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.80%	53.18%	-40.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.89%	120.98%	-87.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.84%	146.68%	-102.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.23%	169.63%	-114.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.09%	169.63%	-108.54%

FAS vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAS vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	8.39%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAS and MSTU in my portfolio?

FAS and MSTU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAS or MSTU?

MSTU has higher volatility (53.18%) compared to FAS (12.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs MSTU's -99.43%.

Which ETF is better, FAS or MSTU?

On 1-year performance, FAS leads with 9.95% vs -98.18% for MSTU. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAS or MSTU?

Over the 1-year period, FAS has performed better with a 9.95% return vs -98.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAS or MSTU?

FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAS or MSTU?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.39%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

What is the main difference between FAS and MSTU?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for FAS and 1.05% for MSTU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.