FAS vs. JNUG
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) and JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while JNUG is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 21.50%/yr vs -30.17%/yr for JNUG. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for JNUG.
Performance
FAS vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -43.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has outperformed JNUG with an annualized return of 21.50%, while JNUG has yielded a comparatively lower -30.17% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 21.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.87%
JNUG
- 1D
- 11.43%
- 1M
- -20.63%
- 6M
- -59.92%
- YTD
- -43.35%
- 1Y
- 45.37%
- 3Y*
- 49.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- -30.17%
- ALL TIME*
- -36.00%
FAS vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 0.21% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -43.35% | 478.59% | 9.96% | -4.79% | -43.60% | -46.61% | -85.51% | 82.43% | -48.11% | -20.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and JNUG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013 | 0.08 |
The correlation between FAS and JNUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FAS vs. JNUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
JNUG
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FAS
JNUG
-
Technology
FAS
JNUG
-
Industrials
FAS
JNUG
-
Basic Materials
FAS
-
JNUG
Communication Services
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Energy
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Healthcare
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Real Estate
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Utilities
FAS
-
JNUG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
JNUG
FAS vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.65 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 1.34 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and JNUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -99.95% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -70.58% | +29.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -70.58% | +27.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -76.67% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -99.66% | +13.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -99.69% | +91.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -93.92% | +62.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.46% | 34.03% | -15.57% |
Volatility
FAS vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) is 11.68%, while Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a volatility of 29.35%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 29.35% | -17.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.49% | 91.33% | -57.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.44% | 106.74% | -63.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.96% | 82.18% | -27.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.10% | 106.01% | -44.91% |
FAS vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than JNUG's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 8.37% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 2.52% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.06% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and JNUG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JNUG has higher volatility (29.35%) compared to FAS (11.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs JNUG's -99.95%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 21.50% vs -30.17% for JNUG. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 11.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 21.50% return vs -30.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 2.52% for JNUG.
FAS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JNUG is Gold. FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.88% for FAS and 1.03% for JNUG.
JNUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and JNUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer