FAS vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FAS returned 5.47% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

FAS vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.

FAS

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 11.10%
• YTD: -10.50%
• 6M: -13.84%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 41.93%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 22.50%

IBIC

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	-10.50%	21.48%	84.47%	21.08%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.43%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.07

Return for Risk

FAS vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 11
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 10

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAS	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	4.99	-4.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	8.97	-8.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	2.22	-1.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	16.56	-16.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.30	58.67	-58.37

FAS vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAS vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAS	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.61%	-0.90%	-90.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.88%	-0.27%	-40.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.88%	-0.08%	-17.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.10%	-0.10%	-31.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.17%	0.08%	+18.09%

Volatility

FAS vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a higher volatility of 12.26% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that FAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAS	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.26%	0.17%	+12.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.44%	0.67%	+32.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.36%	0.89%	+42.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.35%	1.56%	+53.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.18%	1.56%	+59.62%

FAS vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAS vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than IBIC's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	9.32%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.58%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAS and IBIC in my portfolio?

FAS and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAS or IBIC?

FAS has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, FAS or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, FAS leads with 5.47% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAS or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, FAS has performed better with a 5.47% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAS or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAS or IBIC?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 3.58% for IBIC.

What is the main difference between FAS and IBIC?

FAS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.