FAS vs. BRKL
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FAS is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
FAS vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAS
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 39.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 22.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.10%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $68.48M | $83.31M | $86.79M |
FAS vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 3.23% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and BRKL is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAS vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -7.03% | -84.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -0.13% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.97% | -4.14% | -26.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.40% | — | — |
Volatility
FAS vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 30.99% | +12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.99% | 30.99% | +24.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.11% | 30.99% | +30.12% |
FAS vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 8.05% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and BRKL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for FAS and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for FAS and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer