PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAS vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAS vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -29.25% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's -21.97% return.


FAS

1D
6.35%
1M
-11.64%
YTD
-29.25%
6M
-27.65%
1Y
-18.17%
3Y*
32.31%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
18.68%

AMDG

1D
7.34%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-21.97%
6M
16.89%
1Y
133.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAS vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASAMDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.32

1.04

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

2.13

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.28

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

2.32

-2.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.01

4.53

-5.55

FAS vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and AMDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

1.04

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.35

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and AMDG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FAS vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.79%, less than AMDG's 14.36% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
11.79%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
14.36%11.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAS vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and AMDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FASAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-63.04%

-28.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-56.48%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.08%

-52.31%

+17.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

-27.66%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.87%

28.88%

-14.01%

Volatility

FAS vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 14.32%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 33.06%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FASAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

33.06%

-18.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.33%

98.59%

-64.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.51%

129.74%

-72.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.69%

124.94%

-69.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.35%

124.94%

-63.59%