FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FAS.L (Fidelity Asian Values) and ASIANPAINT.NS (Asian Paints Limited) are both stocks. FAS.L operates in Collective Investments (Financial Services), while ASIANPAINT.NS operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, FAS.L returned 10.30%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for ASIANPAINT.NS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) and Asian Paints Limited (ASIANPAINT.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FAS.L is traded in GBp, while ASIANPAINT.NS is traded in INR. To make them comparable, the ASIANPAINT.NS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS.L achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than ASIANPAINT.NS's -8.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS.L has outperformed ASIANPAINT.NS with an annualized return of 10.30%, while ASIANPAINT.NS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.

FAS.L

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -10.19%
• YTD: -5.37%
• 6M: -6.31%
• 1Y: 12.99%
• 3Y*: 5.82%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 10.30%

ASIANPAINT.NS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: -8.71%
• 6M: -10.72%
• 1Y: 9.10%
• 3Y*: -11.32%
• 5Y*: -5.30%
• 10Y*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS.L Fidelity Asian Values	-5.37%	22.24%	0.90%	7.17%	10.44%	13.50%	3.91%	2.21%	5.92%	14.46%
ASIANPAINT.NS Asian Paints Limited	-8.71%	8.53%	-32.89%	5.02%	-7.42%	21.83%	48.02%	22.80%	15.87%	27.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS.L and ASIANPAINT.NS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007	0.18

The correlation between FAS.L and ASIANPAINT.NS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS.L

FAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
FAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ASIANPAINT.NS

ASIANPAINT.NS Risk / Return Rank: 65
ASIANPAINT.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ASIANPAINT.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ASIANPAINT.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ASIANPAINT.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ASIANPAINT.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) and Asian Paints Limited (ASIANPAINT.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAS.L	ASIANPAINT.NS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.37	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	0.71	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.09	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	0.29	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	0.63	+2.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the ASIANPAINT.NS Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS.L and ASIANPAINT.NS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAS.L	ASIANPAINT.NS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	0.37	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	-0.23	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.31	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.78	-0.28

Drawdowns

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS.L drawdown since its inception was -58.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ASIANPAINT.NS drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS.L and ASIANPAINT.NS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAS.L	ASIANPAINT.NS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.25%	-56.57%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.07%	-32.33%	+16.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.07%	-48.63%	+32.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.44%	-56.57%	+38.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.04%	-56.57%	+11.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.07%	-46.47%	+30.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.79%	-13.73%	+4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.71%	14.54%	-9.83%

Volatility

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) is 6.45%, while Asian Paints Limited (ASIANPAINT.NS) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that FAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIANPAINT.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAS.L	ASIANPAINT.NS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.45%	7.17%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.58%	20.16%	-6.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.88%	24.98%	-9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	23.94%	-7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	26.54%	-8.17%

Dividends

FAS.L vs. ASIANPAINT.NS - Dividend Comparison

FAS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than ASIANPAINT.NS's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASIANPAINT.NS Asian Paints Limited	0.93%	0.90%	1.42%	0.78%	0.64%	0.54%	0.43%	0.62%	0.65%	0.72%	0.89%	0.74%
FAS.L Fidelity Asian Values	3.63%	3.44%	2.88%	2.82%	2.83%	1.90%	2.05%	2.15%	1.34%	1.28%	1.30%	0.90%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAS.L and ASIANPAINT.NS in my portfolio?

FAS.L and ASIANPAINT.NS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.