FAS.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FAS.L or VOO.
Key characteristics
| FAS.L | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.61% | 18.91% |
| 1Y Return | -4.83% | 28.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.32% | 9.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.61% | 15.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.94% | 12.87% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.28 | 2.21 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.15% | 12.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.25% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.56% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS.L and VOO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FAS.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FAS.L achieves a -6.61% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 18.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.94%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FAS.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FAS.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FAS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than VOO's 1.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS.L Fidelity Asian Values | 3.02% | 2.82% | 2.83% | 1.91% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 1.34% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.28% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
FAS.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS.L drawdown since its inception was -72.25%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FAS.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) is 3.26%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that FAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.