FAS.L vs. BRSC.L
FAS.L (Fidelity Asian Values) and BRSC.L (Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Collective Investments industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FAS.L returned 10.94%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for BRSC.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS.L achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than BRSC.L's 2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS.L has outperformed BRSC.L with an annualized return of 10.94%, while BRSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.53% annualized return.
FAS.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
BRSC.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- -5.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS.L Fidelity Asian Values | -0.67% | 22.24% | 0.90% | 7.17% | 10.44% | 13.50% | 3.91% | 2.21% | 5.92% | 14.46% |
BRSC.L Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc | 2.88% | -1.21% | 2.19% | 5.25% | -34.32% | 23.97% | 4.04% | 45.82% | -6.20% | 38.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS.L and BRSC.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 1996 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
FAS.L:
£382.62M
BRSC.L:
£524.72M
FAS.L:
£1.57
BRSC.L:
£1.36
FAS.L:
3.77
BRSC.L:
9.73
FAS.L:
3.19
BRSC.L:
8.20
FAS.L:
0.92
BRSC.L:
0.87
FAS.L:
£125.14M
BRSC.L:
£66.31M
FAS.L:
£118.06M
BRSC.L:
£59.86M
FAS.L:
£115.09M
BRSC.L:
£57.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FAS.L
BRSC.L
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) and Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc (BRSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAS.L | BRSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.33 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 1.09 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAS.L | BRSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.35 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.26 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.26 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS.L drawdown since its inception was -72.25%, which is greater than BRSC.L's maximum drawdown of -65.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS.L and BRSC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS.L | BRSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.25% | -65.33% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -17.49% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -31.10% | +17.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.44% | -46.13% | +27.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.04% | -55.18% | +10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.90% | -30.98% | +19.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -13.79% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 5.27% | -0.85% |
Volatility
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asian Values (FAS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc (BRSC.L) at 4.83%. This indicates that FAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS.L | BRSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 4.83% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 13.60% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 16.41% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 19.77% | -3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 24.82% | -6.47% |
Dividends
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Dividend Comparison
FAS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than BRSC.L's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSC.L Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc | 3.38% | 3.40% | 3.10% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.87% | 2.33% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.61% |
FAS.L Fidelity Asian Values | 3.46% | 3.44% | 2.88% | 2.82% | 2.83% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 1.34% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 0.81% |
Financials
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidelity Asian Values and Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAS.L vs. BRSC.L - Profitability Comparison
FAS.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity Asian Values reported a gross profit of 44.61M and revenue of 45.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.8%.
BRSC.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc reported a gross profit of 48.86M and revenue of 50.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
FAS.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity Asian Values reported an operating income of 44.12M and revenue of 45.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 96.7%.
BRSC.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc reported an operating income of 48.25M and revenue of 50.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 94.9%.
FAS.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidelity Asian Values reported a net income of 41.20M and revenue of 45.63M, resulting in a net margin of 90.3%.
BRSC.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blackrock Smaller Companies Trust plc reported a net income of 47.32M and revenue of 50.84M, resulting in a net margin of 93.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS.L and BRSC.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FAS.L and BRSC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer