PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FARSX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FARSX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A (FARSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARSX achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FARSX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 5.43%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.


FARSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.70%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.40%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
5.43%

FFANX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.55%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.67%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
6.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARSX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FARSX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A
4.14%10.71%4.91%9.25%-13.76%5.06%10.62%14.14%-3.90%11.79%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.59%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FARSX and FFANX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007

0.95

The correlation between FARSX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FARSX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARSX
FARSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FARSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FARSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARSX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A (FARSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FARSXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.27

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

13.93

-2.59

FARSX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARSX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FARSX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARSX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARSX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FARSXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-31.69%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-5.20%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

-7.55%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-18.52%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

-18.52%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-3.79%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.22%

-0.28%

Volatility

FARSX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A (FARSX) is 2.05%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that FARSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FARSXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

3.02%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

6.03%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.06%

7.07%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

7.94%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

7.74%

-1.38%

FARSX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARSX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FARSX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

FARSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FARSX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A
2.76%2.63%2.64%2.32%4.65%4.97%3.17%3.05%6.06%23.98%1.80%4.22%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FARSX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFANX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to FARSX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARSX dropped -40.28% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FARSX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer