PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FARMX vs. FMGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARMX achieves a 15.91% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 9.07% return.


FARMX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
15.91%
6M
15.34%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*

FMGIX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
9.07%
6M
8.99%
1Y
14.85%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FARMX
Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund
15.91%7.99%-4.83%-11.61%13.68%23.36%53.58%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
9.07%22.67%34.26%4.86%-9.46%13.84%13.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FARMX and FMGIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.48

The correlation between FARMX and FMGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FARMX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARMX
FARMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FARMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FARMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FMGIX
FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FARMXFMGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.17

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

6.41

-4.58

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARMX and FMGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARMX drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum FMGIX drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARMX and FMGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FARMXFMGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-57.57%

+27.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-7.11%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.81%

-20.56%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.27%

-26.61%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-3.15%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-5.33%

-7.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

2.40%

+2.72%

Volatility

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) at 3.46%. This indicates that FARMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FARMXFMGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.46%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

8.66%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

10.49%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

28.53%

-9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

52.58%

-32.93%

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FARMX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison

FARMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FMGIX's 30.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FARMX
Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund
1.59%1.85%2.29%1.33%1.17%0.71%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
30.83%33.65%48.77%4.79%3.98%2.63%2.38%2.63%3.09%3.15%2.83%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FARMX and FMGIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FARMX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FMGIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARMX dropped -30.27% vs FMGIX's -57.57%.

FMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FARMX and FMGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer