PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FARFX vs. FRIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FARFX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FRIMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
3.20%
YTD
3.59%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
4.25%
ALL TIME*
4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FARFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A
4.40%13.15%6.30%11.55%-15.86%7.73%12.80%17.23%-5.29%13.98%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.59%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FARFX and FRIMX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.95

The correlation between FARFX and FRIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FARFX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FRIMX
FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A (FARFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FARFXFRIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.93

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FARFXFRIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

Volatility

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FARFXFRIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARFX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FARFX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison

FARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than FRIMX's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FARFX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class A
3.35%2.43%2.35%2.21%4.50%4.96%3.36%3.64%6.83%24.58%2.20%4.23%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.11%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FARFX and FRIMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FARFX and FRIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer