PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPR vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAPR vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAPR vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
1.09%7.58%18.14%19.50%-10.33%8.65%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
0.18%33.03%21.80%13.24%-2.42%-2.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than BGLD's 0.18% return.


FAPR

1D
1.12%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.09%
6M
3.22%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
10Y*

BGLD

1D
2.63%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
2.66%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAPR vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAPR vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPR
FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPR vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPRBGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.37

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.89

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.51

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

7.80

-1.97

FAPR vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPR and BGLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPRBGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.37

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.09

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FAPR and BGLD is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FAPR vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

FAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.24%.


TTM2025202420232022
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.24%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%

Drawdowns

FAPR vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, roughly equal to the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and BGLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPRBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-16.19%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-11.11%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.35%

+7.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-3.54%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.15%

-0.41%

Volatility

FAPR vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is 1.77%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAPRBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

6.83%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

9.28%

-6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

12.06%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

9.88%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

9.87%

+0.71%