FAPR vs. BGLD
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD).
FAPR and BGLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FAPR is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Apr 16, 2021. BGLD is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Jan 20, 2021.
Performance
FAPR vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAPR vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 1.09% | 7.58% | 18.14% | 19.50% | -10.33% | 8.65% |
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 0.18% | 33.03% | 21.80% | 13.24% | -2.42% | -2.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly higher than BGLD's 0.18% return.
FAPR
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGLD
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 16.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAPR vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAPR vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank
FAPR
BGLD
FAPR vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAPR | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.37 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.89 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.51 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 7.80 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAPR | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.37 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.09 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAPR and BGLD is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAPR vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison
FAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 44.24% | 44.32% | 25.04% | 10.49% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
FAPR vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, roughly equal to the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and BGLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAPR | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -16.19% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -11.11% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.35% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -3.54% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.15% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FAPR vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is 1.77%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAPR | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 6.83% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 9.28% | -6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 12.06% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 9.88% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 9.87% | +0.71% |