PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPMX vs. GQRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPMX achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than GQRIX's 7.75% return.


FAPMX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.98%
YTD
2.56%
6M
2.23%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
10Y*

GQRIX

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.32%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FAPMX
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund
2.56%7.56%17.12%18.85%-4.79%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.75%0.91%20.18%19.79%-6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPMX and GQRIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2022

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between FAPMX and GQRIX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAPMX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPMX
FAPMX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FAPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRIX
GQRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GQRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPMXGQRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.86

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.29

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.57

3.02

+1.55

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the GQRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPMX and GQRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPMXGQRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.86

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.71

-0.05

Drawdowns

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPMX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, smaller than the maximum GQRIX drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPMX and GQRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPMXGQRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.95%

-28.86%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-5.40%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.95%

-16.47%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-3.45%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.91%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.55%

+0.16%

Volatility

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) at 2.70%. This indicates that FAPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAPMXGQRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.70%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

6.92%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

8.96%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

14.67%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

17.26%

-2.12%

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPMX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAPMX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison

FAPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than GQRIX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FAPMX
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund
1.41%1.44%0.07%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.37%7.94%6.46%1.39%2.99%1.65%0.11%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAPMX and GQRIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAPMX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to GQRIX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPMX dropped -16.95% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.

FAPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAPMX and GQRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer