FAPMX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAPMX (Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, FAPMX returned 11.34%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for CSUAX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAPMX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPMX achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 10.30% return.

FAPMX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 15.80%
• 3Y*: 11.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSUAX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 17.70%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FAPMX Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund	4.64%	7.56%	17.12%	18.85%	-4.79%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	10.30%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPMX and CSUAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2022	0.56

The correlation between FAPMX and CSUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAPMX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPMX

FAPMX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FAPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FAPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FAPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FAPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FAPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 52
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAPMX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.87	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.66	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	3.08	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	9.76	-3.54

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPMX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPMX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPMX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAPMX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.95%	-52.20%	+35.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.27%	-5.99%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.95%	-14.95%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.66%	+2.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-8.43%	+4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	1.88%	+0.83%

Volatility

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.43%. This indicates that FAPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAPMX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	3.43%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	7.89%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.65%	9.88%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	12.98%	+2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	14.92%	+0.21%

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPMX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAPMX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

FAPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than CSUAX's 7.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.33%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
FAPMX Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund	2.37%	1.44%	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAPMX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

FAPMX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAPMX or CSUAX?

FAPMX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to CSUAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPMX dropped -16.95% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.