PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPDX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FAPDX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPDX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.40% return.


FAPDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
10Y*

FXNAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FAPDX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.39%4.57%5.32%5.03%0.57%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.40%7.14%1.35%5.82%-6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPDX and FXNAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022

0.42

The correlation between FAPDX and FXNAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAPDX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPDX
FAPDX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FAPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FAPDX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPDXFXNAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.72

1.28

+2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

9.97

1.93

+8.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.36

1.23

+2.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

14.75

1.90

+12.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

67.88

5.85

+62.03

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.72, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPDX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPDXFXNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72

1.28

+2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.00

0.45

+3.55

Drawdowns

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPDX drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPDX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPDXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-19.51%

+19.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.29%

-2.94%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-6.16%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.89%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-3.87%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.96%

-0.90%

Volatility

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FAPDX) is 0.26%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that FAPDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAPDXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

1.42%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

2.82%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

3.98%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.03%

6.07%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.03%

5.01%

-3.98%

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAPDX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FAPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FXNAX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAPDX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund
4.63%4.40%4.81%3.21%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.71%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAPDX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FAPDX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPDX dropped -0.49% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FAPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAPDX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer