FAPDX vs. FCVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FAPDX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX).
FAPDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 13, 2022. FCVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003.
Performance
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAPDX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.49% | 4.57% | 5.32% | 5.03% | 0.57% |
FCVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C | 0.00% | 10.14% | 24.29% | 18.53% | -10.01% |
Returns By Period
FAPDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCVFX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 16.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAPDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVFX's 1.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAPDX vs. FCVFX — Risk / Return Rank
FAPDX
FCVFX
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FAPDX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAPDX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.80 | 0.78 | +3.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.07 | 1.25 | +7.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.94 | 1.17 | +1.77 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.12 | 0.98 | +13.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.65 | 4.01 | +53.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAPDX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80 | 0.78 | +3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.99 | 0.39 | +3.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAPDX and FCVFX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Dividend Comparison
FAPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than FCVFX's 8.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAPDX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 4.26% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 3.21% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C | 8.22% | 8.22% | 25.20% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 0.00% | 2.46% | 14.34% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAPDX drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum FCVFX drawdown of -65.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPDX and FCVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAPDX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -65.18% | +64.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | -14.97% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -9.99% | +9.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -9.12% | +9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 3.66% | -3.59% |
Volatility
FAPDX vs. FCVFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond FundFidelity SAI Sustainable Emerging Markets Equity Fund (FAPDX) is 0.28%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that FAPDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAPDX | FCVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 5.31% | -5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.79% | 11.64% | -10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10% | 21.51% | -20.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.01% | 21.28% | -20.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.01% | 22.51% | -21.50% |