FAOFX vs. PRPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX).
FAOFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. PRPFX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Nov 30, 1982.
Performance
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund | -12.86% | 22.32% | 39.90% | 46.96% | -37.34% | 13.29% | 68.46% | 40.79% | 16.47% | 35.62% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 2.72% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 18.80% | 19.20% | -7.02% | 11.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a -12.86% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 2.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX has outperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 19.70%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.
FAOFX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -12.86%
- 6M
- -11.62%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 19.70%
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAOFX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank
FAOFX
PRPFX
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAOFX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.86 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 2.31 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 3.07 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 11.17 | -7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAOFX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.86 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 1.11 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 1.03 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.80 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAOFX and PRPFX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison
FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.77%, more than PRPFX's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund | 17.77% | 15.49% | 8.75% | 0.33% | 0.54% | 30.66% | 32.61% | 28.66% | 24.08% | 10.40% | 4.35% | 11.85% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.18% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
Drawdowns
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and PRPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAOFX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.59% | -27.16% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -8.10% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.59% | -15.49% | -28.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -20.84% | -22.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -8.10% | -7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -3.52% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 2.22% | +2.09% |
Volatility
FAOFX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) at 3.59%. This indicates that FAOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAOFX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 3.59% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 11.32% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.38% | 13.77% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 11.04% | +13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 10.57% | +13.22% |