FAOFX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
FAOFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund | -8.82% | 22.32% | 39.90% | 46.96% | -37.34% | 13.29% | 68.46% | 40.79% | 16.47% | 35.62% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -2.49% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a -8.82% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 20.25%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.96% annualized return.
FAOFX
- 1D
- 4.64%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -8.82%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 25.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.25%
FCGSX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FAOFX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
FAOFX
FCGSX
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAOFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.66 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.34 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.98 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 13.43 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAOFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.66 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.95 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.88 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAOFX and FCGSX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund | 16.99% | 15.49% | 8.75% | 0.33% | 0.54% | 30.66% | 32.61% | 28.66% | 24.08% | 10.40% | 4.35% | 11.85% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 10.74% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAOFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.59% | -38.77% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -13.10% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.59% | -38.77% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -38.77% | -4.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.56% | -6.44% | -5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -7.05% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.91% | +1.47% |
Volatility
FAOFX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) have volatilities of 8.34% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAOFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.34% | 8.15% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 14.39% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 24.14% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 23.69% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 23.19% | +0.64% |